Posts Tagged ‘grading’

Grading and Its Discontents

Thursday, May 2nd, 2013

In his article entitled, “Grading and Its Discontents” (The Chronicle, July 11, 2012), Ahmed Afzaal reflected about grading in ways that you may find helpful when you are discontented with grading.  To find out how to minimize discontent, he asked his students for their thoughts on grading.  The responses led to several suggestions you can use in your teaching.  Below is the first of those suggestions.  More will follow in subsequent postings.

“The nature of grading.

Grading is a tool, I tell my students. And like any other tool, it is meant to perform certain specific functions. To explain those functions, I like to use a simple analogy.

Consider a car’s speedometer. It is a tool that performs two interrelated functions: (1) It measures speed, and (2) it communicates that information to the driver. In a somewhat similar way, grading is a tool that also performs two interrelated functions: (1) It assesses academic performance, and (2) it communicates that information to the student. When driving, you glance at the speedometer to determine the speed of the vehicle—if it is what you want, you try to maintain it; if not, you make appropriate adjustments. That is analogous to how students are supposed to use, and benefit from, whatever it is that their grades are telling them.

It’s perfectly normal to desire good grades since they serve as evidence that a student has demonstrated competence in a particular area. But problems arise when students assume that their primary goal in college is to earn good grades so they can achieve or maintain a certain GPA. That is like believing that the primary goal of driving a car is not to reach a particular destination but to achieve or maintain a certain speed.

Since grades have only instrumental value—rather than any intrinsic value—they must be treated as only means to some end, and never as ends in themselves. I tell my students: If your primary goal in college is to receive good grades, you will probably view the required work as an onerous obstacle and you’re not likely to feel very motivated to do the work. But you are most likely to receive good grades when you are so focused on learning that grades have ceased to matter.”

CITL Answers – October 2012

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2012

Question: Grading is a difficult task. Sometimes grading can be objective; other times it can be too subjective. How can I grade more fairly and effectively?

Answer: Not only is grading a difficult task, it is a complicated one. There is no simple answer to your question. Many elements go into awarding grades that students earn. To be fair means that the grades reflect how well students per­formed on the learning goals for the course. To be effective means that the grades, awarded throughout the course, helped students reach the learning goals. The single best advice to get you on your way to fair and effective grading is a paraphrase of Walvoord and Anderson (Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment in College): teach what you grade and grade what you teach.

How Can We Stop Grade Inflation?

Tuesday, September 11th, 2012

How can we stop grade inflation?  Just stop inflating grades!  I frequently return to a 2008 quote by Mary Biggs, which appeared in Grade Inflation: Academic Standards in Higher Education.  She wrote that “the cause of grade inflation is the faculty.  We give inflated grades.”  Here we are in 2012.  We still discuss the grade inflation problem, but we are also still giving the same explanation:  faculty inflate grades.  To better understand what inflating grades does and does not do, check out a June 25, 2012 Chronicle article on the topic:  http://chronicle.com/article/To-Stop-Grade-Inflation-Just/132415/.

Why Faculty Inflate Grades

Monday, February 6th, 2012

In the 2008 book edited by Lester Hunt, Grade Inflation: Academic Standards in Higher Education, Mary Biggs wrote that the “the cause of grade inflation is the faculty.  We give  inflated grades” (p. 112).  But, you might ask, why do faculty give inflated grades?  Peter Eubanks’ article in the August 9, 2011 issue of Inside  Higher Ed  offered three sources of pressure to give inflated grades.  Pressure from students:  students’ complaints about grades prompt “a nagging fear that minor grading errors have indeed been made and that the student should be given the benefit of the doubt.”  Pressure from administrators:  when faculty are expected “to produce good evaluations, [they can] feel a temptation to inflate grades to secure their own livelihoods.”  Pressure from colleagues:  faculty could believe that “if everyone else is giving out inflated grades, why should they be the ones to stand alone, only to incur the displeasure of students who may be confused by inconsistent standards.”  Finally, pressure to inflate grades comes from the faculty themselves: “efforts in the classroom have sometimes been inadequate, that poor student performance reflects poor preparation or teaching . . . , and that grades must be inflated to compensate for . . . failings.”  Which pressure do you feel most?  Eubanks’ full article can be accessed here:  http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2011/08/09/essay_on_why_faculty_members_participate_in_grade_inflation.

Most Common Grade

Sunday, December 11th, 2011

In Teachers College Record Stuart Rojstaczer and Christopher Healy published an analysis of grades at four-year colleges and universities.  The most common grade is the A.  Forty-three percent of all grades are A.  Private colleges award more than public institutions.  And, the South tends to award fewer As than the other regions of the country.

CITL Answers – November 2010

Monday, November 1st, 2010

Question: Grade inflation seems to be a hot topic these days.  Does it exist at Emerson and what can I do about it?

CITL’s Answer: There is a lot of controversy across the country about grade inflation. There are, however, no simple answers about its existence or what to do about it. Nevertheless, a commonly understood definition for grade inflation is the first step in answering questions. A University of Wyoming’s Webpage, called Grade Inflation: The Current Conversation, has this definition: “ . . . an increase in grades without a corresponding increase in the quality of student work.” For more information, visit that Website.

Once a definition is agreed upon, grades and student learning could be compared over an extended period of time to determine the degree of inflation on campus. Regarding what you can do about it, ask yourself if the grades your students earn are true measures of their learning. Then, to explore and address any grading concerns, sign up for the CITL’s Spring Semester workshop series: Effective Grading for Student Learning. Watch for announcements or contact CITL@emerson.edu.

CITL Answers – February 2010

Monday, February 1st, 2010

Question: Are Emerson’s curricula academically challenging when compared to peer institutions?

CITL’s Answer: Yours is an important question, but it is not easily answered.  The research on academic challenge (also referred to as academic rigor) indicates that the concept is rarely defined.  When it is, the definitions are so conceptualized that any comparisons are invalid.  Because other faculty have asked a similar question and Emerson has not adopted a definition of academic challenge, the CITL is undertaking a study to compare student and faculty perspective about the concept.  The findings may be used to guide grading practices and curricular developments.  If you are faculty and would like to participate in the study, you can complete a very brief questionnaire.  (You are welcome to encourage your students to participate, in our student survey.) Contact Karen St. Clair with questions about the study.

CITL Answers – April 2009

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

Question: How can I be innovative in my teaching and learning?

CITL’s Answer: Emerson faculty are innovative in their teaching by targeting an aspect of their teaching, making a change, and reflecting on the results.  There are ongoing innovations in experiential learning, information literacy, learning outcomes, assessments of student learning, instructional technology, grading, course design and redesign, addressing issues around diversity and multiculturalism, and more.  Contact the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning to discuss how you can undertake an innovation in your teaching to enhance student learning.  E-mail Karen_StClair@Emerson.edu or call x8574.